Quotes searchub Morgagesmortgagelending o Morgagesmortgagelending k
T
x
Quotes searcho Tag ga Morgagesmortgagelending e Morgagesmortgagelending mrsearchg Movers gsearchlsearchnd Lubbock n Texas Morgagesmortgagelending searchesearchorsearchg Lubbock g
Rmsearchrg Quotes g Tag Quotes Morgagesmortgagelending e Texas o Tag tsearchaea
erh Movers Lbbsearchc Remortgage searchosearcht Tag ssearchlsearchssearch searchn
4. We propose that bonds or other debt securities should be restricted to those meeting either one of the requirements in (a) and (b) below -
(a) meeting any one of the following minimum ratings -
|
Credit Rating Agency |
Long Term
|
Short Term
| |
|
Moodys |
Baa2 |
Prime-2 | |
|
Standard and Poors |
BBB |
A-2 | |
|
IBCA |
BBB |
A2 | |
|
JBRI |
A- |
A2 |
(b) issued by, or on which the payment of principal and interest is guaranteed by -
5. The concentration limit referred to in paragraph 3(b) will be relaxed in respect of government and other public securities qualified under paragraph 4(b) as follows :
6. We propose that investment in equities should only be allowed in fully paid-up shares listed on recognised stock exchanges (Annex A). However, as provided in paragraph 14, up to 10% of a funds assets could be invested in shares listed on stock exchanges outside the list. This proposal addresses the concern for sufficient liquidity for the trading of equities and reliance on the disclosure requirements of the exchanges.
7. Because of the hybrid nature of convertibles, we propose that they may be regarded as bonds (paragraphs 4-5 above) having to meet the minimum credit ratings applying to bonds, or be listed on recognised exchanges.
8. Since most warrants are highly leveraged investments, we propose that investments in warrants, including covered warrants, should be limited to 5% of a funds assets. Warrants that have put features are non-permissible except for the purpose of hedging.
9. We propose that :
10. We propose that the investment manager, subject to the prior approval of the trustee, may make arrangement for a fund to -
11. We propose to allow securities lending subject to the following conditions :
12. We propose to allow bond repurchase (repo) agreements subject to the following conditions :
13. We propose to limit the foreign currency exposure to 70% of the fund assets. We would allow hedging of the currency risk of foreign currency assets into Hong Kong dollars for the purpose of determining compliance with the limit.
14. Up to 10% of a funds assets can be invested in :
15. We propose that financial derivatives may be used but limited to financial futures and options traded on recognised futures exchanges (see Annex B) and for the purposes of -
16. We propose that derivative investments of MPF funds should be managed by investment managers and monitored by trustees whose qualifications to operate derivative funds have been vetted by the SFC.
17. The trustee is required to file a report to the MPFA on the proper control and supervision over scheme operation including investment of assets. The report sets out the control objectives and the controls and procedures to achieve these objectives. Auditors will be required to express an opinion in respect of the trustees report, opining as to the existence and effectiveness of controls and procedures and whether they are adequate to meet the objectives. We propose that this report should cover the area of investment in derivatives.
18. We propose that the policy and guidelines regarding derivatives activities should be disclosed in the schemes statement of investment policy and objectives.
19. For the purpose of hedging currency, forward contracts should not exceed twelve months and must be executed through an authorised banking institution in Hong Kong.
20. Any investments other than those mentioned above will be disallowed.
21. Since the risk profile of an investment vehicle is increased by gearing, we propose not to permit investment vehicles that borrow to increase their invested assets.
22. An MPF fund may not invest in commodities or commodity based investments because of the liquidity and valuation problems and their highly speculative nature.
23. Because of the illiquid nature of property and the lack of readily available market values, an MPF fund should not hold direct investments in property.
24. Loans, mortgages and debts are not common investment tools for provident funds due to liquidity and valuation problems. As such, an MPF fund should not make a loan nor engage in any mortgage lending or debt instruments other than those allowed under debt securities and bank deposits.
25. Jewellery, works of art and collectibles should not be allowed.
26. We propose that when the investment limits in the MPF investment restrictions and guidelines are breached -
27. We propose that losses to scheme assets caused by misfeasance or illegal conduct should be covered by the Compensation Fund only if the trustee or investment manager and their professional indemnity insurance and performance guarantee are unable to make up such losses.
28. We propose that when the investment limits in the investment management agreement which are additional to those restrictions and guidelines issued by the MPFA are breached by the investment manager -
29. We propose that these investment losses should not be compensated by the Compensation Fund.
30. The justifications for imposing investment restrictions and guidelines have been given in our previous information note - "Basic Approach of the MPF System : Security of Scheme Assets". The proposals in paragraphs 2 to 25 above are intended to present for the compliance of trustees and investment managers a comprehensive list of permissible and non-permissible investments.
31. For those situations where the breach of limits occurs as a result of outside factors, no person shall be liable for the breach. Such breaches would result from -
32. Section 7.24 of the SFC Code on Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds states that "the management company shall take as a priority objective all steps as are necessary within a reasonable period of time to remedy the situation, taking due account of the interests of the holders". We propose to adopt the same approach for these "passive" breaches.
33. In situations other than those described in paragraph 31, where the breach of limits is the result of the action or inaction of the trustee or investment manager, the trustee or investment manager as appropriate should be required to compensate the scheme for any losses that occur.
34. Where there is misfeasance or illegal conduct by the trustee or investment manager, losses to scheme assets may be covered by the Compensation Fund after exhausting the financial resources of the trustee or investment manager and their professional indemnity insurance and performance guarantee cover.